Put a real decision to the test before executing it.
Marketing. Mentorship and training. Renovations. Consultancies. Technology.
You never fail to invest in improvements, especially those that impact the customer's perception of quality.
But, almost always, he invests with justifications:
“We need to improve customer service.”
“We need to modernize the product.”
“We need to renovate the room.”
“We need to strengthen our brand.”
An architect designs an excellent renovation.
An agency creates an excellent campaign.
A consultant implements an excellent action plan.
A coach or a mentor develops an excellent team and leadership.
Everyone can do an excellent job. But everyone starts from a decision that has already arrived fully formed.
What if the priority was wrong from the start?
Maybe the problem was never the customer service.
Maybe it wasn't the communication.
Maybe it wasn't the structure.
Perhaps the customer simply stops perceiving value at a completely different point in the experience.
No execution, no matter how good it is, corrects a decision made on the wrong priority.
We start with a real decision your company needs to make. Before execution, we confront the available information with the different perceptions and priorities involved in that decision.
The objective is to make observable what may be shaping different interpretations of the same reality, before these differences translate into actions, costs or impacts on customers and employees.
Depending on the decision being analysed, we can confront different sources and perspectives, including:
When these three visions are not aligned, the company continues to invest.
But the customer still perceives something else.
That is why the Decision Lab does not tell you how to execute a decision. It shows what should be considered before executing it.
Why the difference between an investment that generates results and one that merely generates decision-making comfort is rarely in the quality of execution. It is in the quality of the decision.
✔ put a real decision to the test before executing it;
✔ confront data, perceptions and priorities before choosing a course of action;
✔ identify what may be going unnoticed before it turns into cost or impact;
✘ are looking for a list of best practices;
✘ want to copy a competitor;
✘ You have already decided where to invest and are just looking for someone to confirm it.
We make observable the differences between information, perceptions and priorities that may be shaping the decision, so you know what needs to be considered before taking action.



3 steps to decide clearly:
Understand what is shaping the decision.
Identify differences in perceptions and priorities.
Confronte as informações e coloque a decisão à prova.
The Executive Decision Lab can be conducted within your company. This preserves the context, provides greater comfort for the team and limits the budget. But remaining in the same environment also means observing the problem through already familiar frames of reference.
That is why we also created the Paris and Istanbul experiences. Not just a day of discussion, but three days to shift the point of observation, confront perspectives and return to the decision from different contexts.
The objective is not simply to present the results. It is to confront them with perspectives capable of challenging the perceived reality and triggering a shift in perception.
We observe the decision within its own frame of reference.
A real decision from your company is worked on online or within the organisation itself, without intentionally confronting it with an external reality..
The work focuses on what already shapes your perspective: information, priorities, representations, constraints and decision criteria.
We shift the perspective to see differently what seemed obvious.
In Paris, participants confront their real decision with experiences, environments and technical visits selected to shift their frames of reference..
The change of context is not intended to discover Paris. It is intended to sharpen the perspective, temporarily suspend the assumptions constructed within the company and observe differently what, until then, had seemed obvious.
We multiply the frames through which the same decision is interpreted.
In Istanbul, the shift goes further: participants confront the mechanisms underlying their decision with other cultural, relational and organisational perspectives, in an environment where the same signals, behaviours and situations can be interpreted differently.
The objective is to put to the test what changes in the analysis when the frame of reference changes and broaden the capacity to consider interpretations that would not spontaneously be your own.
Bring a real decision to the Executive Decision Lab.